From the CFPB1
USE OF EXTERNAL OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE
a) “Open Source Software” (OSS) is software that allows its recipients to modify and redistribute the source code; as such, “open source” is a copyright and distribution framework and makes no implications regarding technical support or indemnification. In almost all cases, OSS meets the definition of “commercial computer software” and shall be given appropriate statutory preference in accordance with 41 USC 264B (reference (b)) (see also FAR 2.101(b), 12_1.html 12.000, 12.101 (reference (c))).
b) Executive agencies, including YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME, are required to conduct market research when preparing for the procurement of products or services by 41 USC Sec. 253a (reference (e)) (see also FAR 10.001. Market research for software should include OSS.
a. There are several positive aspects of OSS that should compel YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME to seek out OSS when conducting market research on software for Bureau-wide use:
i. Publicly available source code enables continuous and broad peer review that ensures rigorous security and reliability. Specifically, this process encourages the identification and elimination of defects that might otherwise go unrecognized by a more limited core development team.
ii. The unrestricted ability to modify software source code enables YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME to respond more rapidly to constantly changing missions and markets, and is critical to YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME’s ability to create new tools and keep pace with industry.
iii. Using OSS instead of proprietary software may reduce reliance on a particular software developer or vendor. OSS can be operated and maintained by multiple vendors, thus reducing barriers to entry and exit.
iv. Open source licenses do not restrict who can use the software or the endeavors in which the software can be used. This allows YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME to endlessly reuse existing OSS-based products to satisfy new needs quickly and secure substantial cost savings for the Bureau.
v. Since the monetary cost of OSS typically lies in support and maintenance as opposed to licensing, OSS can provide a cost advantage in situations where many copies of the software may be required, and can mitigate risk of cost growth due to licensing in situations where the total number of users may not be known in advance.
vi. By sharing the responsibility for maintenance of OSS with other users, YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME can benefit by reducing the total cost of ownership for software, particularly compared with software for which YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME has sole responsibility for maintenance (e.g., GOTS).
vii. OSS is particularly suitable for rapid prototyping and experimentation, where the ability to “test drive” the software with minimal costs and administrative delays can be important.
b. While these considerations may be relevant, they may not be the overriding drivers to any decision about software. Ultimately, the software that best meets the needs and mission of YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME should be used, regardless of whether the software is open source.
c) The use of any software without appropriate maintenance and support presents an information assurance risk. Before approving the use of software (including OSS), system/program managers, and ultimately Designated Approving Authorities (DAAs), must ensure that the plan for software support (e.g., commercial or Government program office support) is adequate for mission need.
d) It is important to understand both the specifics of the open source license in question and how YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME intends to use and redistribute any Bureau-modified OSS. There is a misconception that the Government is always obligated to distribute the source code of any modified OSS to the public, and therefore that OSS should not be integrated or modified for use in sensitive YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME systems. In contrast, many open source licenses permit the user to modify OSS for internal use without being obligated to distribute source code to the public. However, if the user chooses to distribute the modified OSS outside the user’s organization (e.g., a Government user distributes the code outside the Government), then some OSS licenses (such as the GNU General Public License) do require distribution of the corresponding source code to the recipient of the software.
e) When contracting developer services, YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME will encourage vendors to use open source technology wherever possible, for the reasons cited in a)i-vii above.
f) In order to facilitate the auditing of YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME’s software catalog, the Technology & Innovation office will use a source code analysis tool to index its open source assets and their respective licensing obligations.
REDISTRIBUTION OF YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME CODE
a) Software source code written entirely by YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME staff, and by contractors who are developing software on behalf of YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME, is by default a public domain work.
b) Software source code previously released under an open source license and then modified by YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME staff is considered a “joint work” (see 17 USC § 101); it is partially copyrighted, partially public domain, and as a whole is protected by the copyrights of the non-government authors and must be released according to the terms of the original open-source license.
c) All source code as defined in 2)a and 2)b above must be catalogued and shared with the general public via a highly visible, easily accessible online source code community that facilitates the code’s reuse. Source code shall not be released if any of the following conditions are met:
a. The author of the code in question determines that the code is too crude to merit distribution or provide value to the broader community.
b. The Government does not have the rights to reproduce and release the item. The Government has public release rights when the software is developed by Government personnel, when the Government receives “unlimited rights” in software developed by a contractor at Government expense, or when pre-existing OSS is modified by or for the Government.
c. The public release of the item is restricted by other law or regulation, such as the Export Administration Regulations or the International Traffic in Arms Regulation.
d. YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME cybersecurity staff determine that the public release of such code would pose an unacceptable risk to YOUR ORGANIZATION NAME’s operational security.